#59 Carlos Carrasco
Team: Atlanta Braves
Position: P
Profile: Variable
TriSync Rating:
TriSync Level:
📢 TriSync Expert Analysis
05/02/26 05/03/26 05/04/26
Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)
Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
Level
G
W
L
SV
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
K
K/9IP
ERA
WHIP
BAA
Game Rating +/-
Excellent
6
2
0
0
31.1
25
9
9
3
8
33
9.5
2.59
1.05
0.208
+74.96%
Good
36
12
6
0
174.2
195
96
91
22
65
157
8.1
4.69
1.49
0.281
+13.21%
Fair
44
8
23
0
204.0
244
155
147
43
67
169
7.5
6.49
1.52
0.296
-21.02%
Suboptimal
8
2
3
0
36.0
44
25
25
8
7
33
8.3
6.25
1.42
0.301
-0.07%
Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
Season
G
W
L
SV
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
K
K/9IP
ERA
WHIP
BAA
Game Rating x̄
2026
1
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
9.0
0.00
0.00
0.000
4.37
2025
11
2
2
0
45.2
61
36
36
10
17
34
6.7
7.09
1.71
0.316
1.69
2024
21
3
10
0
103.2
112
68
65
19
33
89
7.7
5.64
1.40
0.276
2.30
2023
20
3
8
0
90.0
115
71
68
18
38
66
6.6
6.80
1.70
0.310
1.58
2022
29
15
7
0
152.0
161
71
67
17
41
152
9.0
3.97
1.33
0.272
3.57
2021
12
1
5
0
53.2
59
39
36
12
18
50
8.4
6.04
1.43
0.272
2.32
Individual Game Stats
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Date
Opponent
Decision
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
K
TriSync Rating
TriSync Level
Game Rating
Apr 23, 2026
@WSH
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5.42
Good
4.37
Aug 13, 2025
@NYM
2.0
6
6
6
1
3
2
3.83
Good
-1.71
Aug 7, 2025
MIA
5.2
9
6
6
1
2
2
5.08
Good
-1.22
Jul 31, 2025
@CIN
6.0
7
3
3
1
2
5
6.93
Excellent
2.31
May 4, 2025
TB
3.0
5
2
2
0
1
3
6.71
Excellent
2.59
Apr 30, 2025
@BAL
L
3.1
8
4
4
2
0
5
3.23
Fair
1.41
Apr 25, 2025
TOR
5.0
3
0
0
0
2
2
4.10
Good
4.42
Apr 19, 2025
@TB
4.0
6
4
4
0
2
1
4.67
Good
0.18
Apr 14, 2025
KC
W
5.0
1
1
1
1
2
4
5.40
Good
5.01
Apr 8, 2025
@DET
L
4.1
6
4
4
3
1
3
1.12
Suboptimal
1.05
Apr 3, 2025
AZ
W
5.1
5
3
3
0
2
5
4.49
Good
3.04
Mar 29, 2025
MIL
2.0
5
3
3
1
0
2
4.88
Good
1.57
Aug 7, 2024
AZ
L
4.1
5
4
4
2
2
5
2.09
Fair
1.45
Aug 2, 2024
BAL
4.1
1
1
1
0
4
5
3.79
Good
4.00
Jul 27, 2024
@PHI
L
3.2
6
6
6
2
1
5
2.87
Fair
-0.15
Jul 22, 2024
DET
L
5.1
9
6
6
1
0
6
2.52
Fair
0.29
Jul 12, 2024
@TB
L
5.0
6
2
1
0
1
3
3.61
Fair
3.69
Jul 7, 2024
SF
5.0
6
3
3
1
1
4
2.13
Fair
2.27
Jul 2, 2024
CWS
6.0
4
3
3
2
1
7
2.20
Fair
3.59
Jun 26, 2024
@BAL
5.0
6
2
2
1
2
3
4.89
Good
2.55
Jun 21, 2024
TOR
W
6.0
4
1
1
1
0
7
6.91
Excellent
6.27
Jun 15, 2024
@TOR
L
5.0
6
5
5
0
2
2
2.96
Fair
-0.17
Jun 9, 2024
@MIA
4.2
4
2
2
1
0
3
3.54
Fair
3.33
Jun 2, 2024
WSH
L
4.0
7
5
5
0
1
5
1.00
Suboptimal
0.58
May 15, 2024
@TEX
L
5.0
5
2
2
1
1
3
2.41
Fair
2.97
May 10, 2024
@CWS
L
7.0
6
5
3
2
0
5
4.41
Good
3.21
May 5, 2024
LAA
W
6.0
6
1
1
0
2
3
5.29
Good
4.17
Apr 30, 2024
@HOU
4.0
6
8
8
2
2
3
2.83
Fair
-2.37
Apr 24, 2024
BOS
L
5.0
9
5
5
3
1
4
3.72
Fair
0.22
Apr 18, 2024
@BOS
W
5.2
4
2
2
0
3
5
6.53
Excellent
3.81
Apr 13, 2024
NYY
L
4.2
5
1
1
0
5
2
2.47
Fair
2.34
Apr 6, 2024
@MIN
3.0
1
1
1
0
3
6
2.52
Fair
4.32
Mar 31, 2024
@OAK
5.0
6
3
3
0
1
3
4.33
Good
1.99
Aug 26, 2023
LAA
L
1.2
7
5
5
1
0
1
1.17
Suboptimal
-0.63
Aug 20, 2023
@STL
L
4.0
9
3
3
1
0
3
5.08
Good
1.67
Aug 14, 2023
PIT
3.0
4
2
2
0
3
5
4.40
Good
2.74
Aug 8, 2023
CHC
5.0
3
2
2
1
2
5
2.02
Fair
3.54
Aug 3, 2023
@KC
L
6.0
8
6
6
2
1
0
3.57
Fair
-1.29
Jul 29, 2023
WSH
L
2.1
8
8
6
0
1
2
3.15
Fair
-1.40
Jul 23, 2023
@BOS
L
2.1
10
5
5
0
2
2
2.62
Fair
-1.15
Jul 18, 2023
CWS
4.2
6
4
4
1
2
5
4.15
Good
1.37
Jul 6, 2023
@AZ
W
8.0
3
0
0
0
1
4
2.35
Fair
6.52
Jun 30, 2023
SF
5.0
5
2
2
1
3
6
5.20
Good
3.26
Jun 25, 2023
@PHI
4.0
5
2
2
1
2
5
5.48
Good
3.07
Jun 18, 2023
STL
3.0
5
6
5
2
3
4
2.05
Fair
-0.13
Jun 11, 2023
@PIT
L
4.2
6
2
2
1
3
1
4.61
Good
1.65
Jun 6, 2023
@ATL
5.0
6
4
4
1
2
4
2.26
Fair
1.16
May 31, 2023
PHI
W
6.0
6
1
1
1
1
4
1.90
Suboptimal
4.76
May 25, 2023
@CHC
W
6.2
5
1
1
1
2
4
3.63
Fair
4.74
May 19, 2023
CLE
5.0
5
5
5
1
2
3
1.35
Suboptimal
0.22
Apr 15, 2023
@OAK
5.0
4
2
2
0
1
3
2.85
Fair
3.11
Apr 9, 2023
MIA
L
4.2
6
6
6
2
3
1
4.78
Good
-1.52
Apr 3, 2023
@MIL
L
4.0
4
5
5
1
4
4
2.37
Fair
-0.09
Oct 4, 2022
WSH
4.0
5
2
2
1
1
3
1.88
Suboptimal
2.78
Sep 27, 2022
MIA
L
3.0
6
4
4
1
1
2
2.78
Fair
0.53
Sep 20, 2022
@MIL
4.0
5
3
3
0
2
4
4.78
Good
1.94
Sep 15, 2022
PIT
W
6.0
4
1
1
0
2
11
4.84
Good
6.88
Sep 10, 2022
@MIA
W
6.0
4
1
1
0
0
6
2.07
Fair
5.96
Sep 4, 2022
WSH
L
2.2
6
5
1
0
2
2
3.63
Fair
2.67
Aug 15, 2022
@ATL
L
2.0
4
3
3
2
1
1
2.46
Fair
1.16
Aug 9, 2022
CIN
W
6.2
7
2
2
1
1
9
4.44
Good
5.34
Aug 4, 2022
ATL
W
6.0
4
3
3
1
1
6
4.13
Good
3.88
Jul 30, 2022
@MIA
W
7.2
4
0
0
0
2
7
2.66
Fair
6.91
Jul 24, 2022
SD
5.0
6
0
0
0
2
1
3.27
Fair
3.69
Jul 14, 2022
@CHC
W
6.0
5
0
0
0
2
6
5.15
Good
6.12
Jul 9, 2022
MIA
5.2
7
2
2
0
2
5
5.17
Good
3.10
Jul 3, 2022
TEX
W
5.2
6
1
1
1
1
8
2.09
Fair
5.89
Jun 28, 2022
HOU
L
4.1
6
6
6
1
3
4
2.11
Fair
-0.81
Jun 22, 2022
@HOU
L
2.1
4
5
5
3
2
2
2.65
Fair
-0.37
Jun 17, 2022
MIA
W
6.1
8
3
3
1
2
7
4.72
Good
3.37
Jun 11, 2022
@LAA
L
4.2
9
5
5
2
1
7
4.33
Good
0.96
Jun 6, 2022
@SD
W
7.0
5
2
2
0
0
10
1.05
Suboptimal
6.32
Jun 1, 2022
WSH
W
5.0
4
0
0
0
5
5
4.25
Good
4.86
May 27, 2022
PHI
W
5.2
6
5
5
0
1
7
4.51
Good
2.11
May 21, 2022
@COL
W
5.1
7
1
1
0
0
4
2.89
Fair
4.78
May 15, 2022
SEA
4.1
8
4
4
0
1
2
4.98
Good
0.51
May 10, 2022
@WSH
W
6.2
7
2
2
1
0
5
4.44
Good
4.45
May 3, 2022
ATL
W
8.0
6
0
0
0
2
5
2.43
Fair
6.06
Apr 27, 2022
@STL
L
3.2
9
8
8
0
2
3
3.55
Fair
-2.80
Apr 21, 2022
SF
W
7.2
4
2
2
1
0
7
3.19
Fair
5.69
Apr 16, 2022
AZ
5.0
3
0
0
0
2
8
6.31
Excellent
6.22
Apr 10, 2022
@WSH
5.2
2
1
1
1
0
5
6.51
Excellent
5.29
Oct 2, 2021
@ATL
L
5.0
7
5
5
2
2
5
2.46
Fair
0.49
Sep 26, 2021
@MIL
L
4.0
7
5
5
1
4
3
2.61
Fair
-0.74
Sep 18, 2021
PHI
L
6.0
5
2
2
2
2
5
5.31
Good
3.45
Sep 12, 2021
NYY
5.0
3
2
2
0
4
5
4.71
Good
2.97
Sep 7, 2021
@MIA
W
5.0
7
4
1
0
1
4
4.15
Good
4.42
Sep 2, 2021
MIA
5.1
4
3
3
1
1
5
2.72
Fair
2.90
Aug 26, 2021
SF
7.0
3
2
2
1
0
5
2.81
Fair
4.52
Aug 20, 2021
@LAD
L
5.0
5
3
3
0
1
6
3.47
Fair
2.97
Aug 15, 2021
LAD
L
2.0
6
6
6
3
1
3
2.68
Fair
-0.95
Aug 11, 2021
WSH
1.0
4
4
4
1
1
0
2.24
Fair
-0.09
Aug 4, 2021
@MIA
4.1
5
2
2
0
0
5
4.38
Good
3.71
Jul 30, 2021
CIN
4.0
3
1
1
1
1
4
1.23
Suboptimal
4.22
If Carlos Carrasco is called on today, he lands in a Fair window that hasn’t been kind to him. His usual inclination in this range leans toward a probable uninspiring outing. The Variable profile adds another layer of variability to the metrics. Best move is to exclude unless you see a clear edge elsewhere.
PI=1.000 PIVS=3.790