Sports - "🚧 Beta currently in progress: Everything is free to explore as we refine and expand the platform."
Back to Players
Is Chad Patrick projected to do well today?
#39 Chad Patrick
Team: Milwaukee Brewers
Profile: Aligned
TriSync Rating: * (5/3)
TriSync Level:
📢 TriSync Expert Analysis
ROTO
Start
⭐
DFS $
Play
Value
DFS G
Play
Value
Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)
Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 13.5 | 1.93 | 1.07 | 0.222 | +39.87% |
| Good | 15 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 60.1 | 56 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 19 | 62 | 9.2 | 2.98 | 1.24 | 0.245 | +5.68% |
| Fair | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 57.1 | 49 | 22 | 22 | 5 | 25 | 50 | 7.8 | 3.45 | 1.29 | 0.237 | -6.13% |
| Suboptimal | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 25.1 | 26 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 24 | 8.5 | 4.26 | 1.34 | 0.260 | -10.30% |
Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 28.0 | 22 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 13 | 16 | 5.1 | 2.57 | 1.25 | 0.222 | 3.45 |
| 2025 | 27 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 119.2 | 113 | 49 | 47 | 13 | 40 | 127 | 9.6 | 3.53 | 1.28 | 0.248 | 3.64 |
Individual Game Stats
| Date | Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | TriSync Rating | TriSync Level | Game Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | AZ | W | 5.0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | Fair | 3.54 | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | @DET | L | 4.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Fair | 0.71 | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | TOR | 6.2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | Good | 3.86 | ||
| Apr 10, 2026 | WSH | 3.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Good | 3.74 | ||
| Apr 4, 2026 | @KC | W | 5.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | Suboptimal | 4.86 | |
| Mar 28, 2026 | CWS | 4.1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Good | 4.00 | ||
| Sep 28, 2025 | CIN | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Good | 4.37 | ||
| Sep 24, 2025 | @SD | 3.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | Fair | 5.36 | ||
| Sep 20, 2025 | @STL | 4.1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Suboptimal | 3.13 | ||
| Sep 16, 2025 | LAA | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Good | 4.96 | ||
| Sep 14, 2025 | STL | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good | 4.22 | ||
| Sep 9, 2025 | @TEX | 4.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | Fair | 2.57 | ||
| Aug 24, 2025 | SF | 5.1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | Good | 4.05 | ||
| Aug 19, 2025 | @CHC | L | 5.0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | Suboptimal | 2.13 | |
| Jul 5, 2025 | @MIA | 5.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Fair | 2.83 | ||
| Jun 29, 2025 | COL | 5.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | Fair | 6.06 | ||
| Jun 23, 2025 | PIT | 5.0 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Good | 2.41 | ||
| Jun 17, 2025 | @CHC | L | 5.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 | Good | 1.44 | |
| Jun 11, 2025 | ATL | L | 5.0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 | Suboptimal | 1.03 | |
| Jun 6, 2025 | SD | L | 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | Good | 4.47 | |
| May 31, 2025 | @PHI | W | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | Suboptimal | 4.91 | |
| May 26, 2025 | BOS | 4.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | Good | 5.54 | ||
| May 21, 2025 | BAL | 4.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | Excellent | 5.09 | ||
| May 16, 2025 | MIN | L | 6.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Fair | 1.62 | |
| May 11, 2025 | @TB | 4.1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | Fair | 2.71 | ||
| May 6, 2025 | HOU | W | 6.2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | Fair | 4.01 | |
| May 1, 2025 | @CWS | L | 5.2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Good | 2.67 | |
| Apr 25, 2025 | @STL | L | 4.1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | Fair | 2.43 | |
| Apr 19, 2025 | ATH | L | 6.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | Good | 4.32 | |
| Apr 12, 2025 | @AZ | 4.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | Fair | 4.29 | ||
| Apr 6, 2025 | CIN | W | 5.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | Fair | 4.63 | |
| Apr 1, 2025 | KC | 4.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | Good | 4.94 | ||
| Mar 29, 2025 | @NYY | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good | 2.08 |
A Good TriSync window supports a disciplined and dependable level of performance. Because Patrick is Aligned, that incremental advantage is more likely to show up on the field, with results that track closely to expectation.
PI=3.800 PIVS=2.940