Jake carries a Developing profile, so his performance phases are still taking shape. This is common for younger players building strength, timing, and routine. The ratings offer guidance, but with narrow sample size, there’s added unpredictability.
PI=3.221 PIVS=2.250
Jake falls into the Developing category, where predictability hasn’t fully locked in. Younger players show this as they refine their approach and physical tools. The data can point you in the right direction, but it comes with a wider margin of error.
PI=3.221 PIVS=3.050
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 9.00 | 2.33 | 0.333 | -83.43% |
| Good | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 8.1 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.125 | +22.92% |
| Fair | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11.0 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6.5 | 4.91 | 1.18 | 0.268 | -2.14% |
| Suboptimal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 54.00 | 6.00 | 0.500 | -43.41% |
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.3 | 2.25 | 1.00 | 0.231 | 3.90 |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18.1 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 7.4 | 4.91 | 1.31 | 0.224 | 3.22 |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 1.50 | 0.286 | 3.11 |
| Date | Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | TriSync Rating | TriSync Level | Game Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | @STL | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 3.93 | ||
| Apr 27, 2026 | MIA | W | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 4.52 | |
| Apr 25, 2026 | CHC | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good | 4.37 | ||
| Apr 20, 2026 | @COL | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Good | 2.78 | ||
| Jul 23, 2025 | @NYM | L | 6.0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | Fair | 1.48 | |
| Jul 18, 2025 | @PHI | 3.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Excellent | 0.53 | ||
| Jul 13, 2025 | AZ | 4.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | Good | 5.26 | ||
| May 27, 2025 | NYY | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Good | 3.79 | ||
| May 25, 2025 | MIA | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Good | 4.57 | ||
| May 2, 2025 | DET | 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Suboptimal | 1.82 | ||
| Apr 30, 2025 | @SEA | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 4.08 | ||
| Apr 27, 2025 | @MIN | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good | 4.22 | ||
| Sep 17, 2024 | @LAA | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Fair | 3.11 |
With a Developing profile, Jake Eder’s statistical returns don’t yet consistently match his cycle indicators. He’s still in the span of growth where patterns are forming. The ratings have limited value, especially with a constrained amount of games played, expect some inconsistency.
PI=2.983 PIVS=2.898