#16 Matthew Boyd
Team: Chicago Cubs
Position: P
Profile: Aligned
TriSync Rating: * (5/3)
TriSync Level:
📢 TriSync Expert Analysis
Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)
Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
Level
G
W
L
SV
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
K
K/9IP
ERA
WHIP
BAA
Game Rating +/-
Excellent
4
1
0
0
15.1
11
2
2
1
6
22
12.9
1.17
1.11
0.196
+52.41%
Good
29
11
6
0
138.0
125
63
57
17
34
125
8.2
3.72
1.15
0.242
+4.92%
Fair
39
12
14
0
203.2
180
91
81
20
54
186
8.2
3.58
1.15
0.236
-0.14%
Suboptimal
11
3
4
0
43.1
42
29
29
6
22
46
9.6
6.02
1.48
0.255
-31.52%
Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
Season
G
W
L
SV
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
K
K/9IP
ERA
WHIP
BAA
Game Rating x̄
2026
4
1
1
0
17.3
21
15
14
1
5
26
13.0
7.00
1.44
0.288
2.72
2025
31
14
8
0
179.2
154
69
64
19
42
154
7.7
3.21
1.09
0.235
3.85
2024
8
2
2
0
39.2
32
16
12
4
13
46
10.4
2.72
1.13
0.213
4.33
2023
15
5
5
0
71.0
69
46
43
11
25
73
9.3
5.45
1.32
0.250
2.83
2022
10
2
0
0
13.1
5
2
2
0
8
13
8.8
1.35
0.97
0.116
4.17
2021
15
3
8
0
78.2
77
37
34
9
23
67
7.7
3.89
1.27
0.255
3.19
Individual Game Stats
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Date
Opponent
Decision
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
K
TriSync Rating
TriSync Level
Game Rating
Apr 27, 2026
@SD
4.0
8
5
5
0
2
4
5.52
Good
-0.09
Apr 22, 2026
PHI
4.2
5
2
2
0
0
5
5.11
Good
3.77
Apr 1, 2026
LAA
W
5.2
2
2
1
0
2
10
4.56
Good
6.81
Mar 26, 2026
WSH
L
3.2
6
6
6
1
1
7
0.96
Suboptimal
0.38
Sep 24, 2025
NYM
W
5.1
2
2
2
1
1
3
2.50
Fair
4.05
Sep 17, 2025
@PIT
3.0
7
4
4
1
2
5
4.98
Good
0.94
Sep 12, 2025
TB
W
5.0
5
4
4
1
2
1
1.09
Suboptimal
1.03
Sep 6, 2025
WSH
L
7.0
7
2
2
1
0
3
4.71
Good
3.35
Aug 31, 2025
@COL
6.0
6
4
4
0
1
5
3.05
Fair
1.90
Aug 26, 2025
@SF
L
5.1
6
5
5
2
3
8
1.00
Suboptimal
1.23
Aug 19, 2025
MIL
W
5.1
6
4
4
1
3
3
3.40
Fair
1.23
Aug 14, 2025
@TOR
L
7.0
2
2
2
1
1
5
5.02
Good
4.37
Aug 8, 2025
@STL
L
5.0
7
3
3
0
0
3
2.93
Fair
2.13
Aug 2, 2025
BAL
7.0
4
0
0
0
0
8
3.00
Fair
7.09
Jul 28, 2025
@MIL
L
5.0
6
5
5
1
5
2
3.02
Fair
-0.95
Jul 22, 2025
KC
W
7.0
4
0
0
0
1
6
1.96
Fair
6.78
Jul 12, 2025
@NYY
W
8.0
4
0
0
0
0
6
3.48
Fair
7.30
Jul 6, 2025
STL
W
5.0
3
0
0
0
1
9
6.99
Excellent
7.45
Jul 1, 2025
CLE
W
7.0
5
2
2
0
1
5
2.59
Fair
4.52
Jun 25, 2025
@STL
W
6.0
3
0
0
0
0
3
4.08
Good
6.12
Jun 20, 2025
SEA
5.0
2
2
2
1
2
6
5.45
Good
3.98
Jun 14, 2025
PIT
W
6.0
1
1
1
1
1
3
3.53
Fair
5.21
Jun 9, 2025
@PHI
6.0
8
2
1
0
2
0
4.01
Good
2.45
Jun 4, 2025
@WSH
L
7.1
4
2
2
1
1
6
2.66
Fair
4.44
May 28, 2025
COL
W
6.0
4
1
0
0
0
8
2.63
Fair
7.51
May 23, 2025
@CIN
4.0
8
4
4
0
2
3
3.27
Fair
0.44
May 17, 2025
CWS
W
6.0
4
3
3
2
0
8
2.58
Fair
4.76
May 11, 2025
@NYM
6.0
6
2
2
1
0
8
5.36
Good
4.76
May 5, 2025
SF
W
6.0
5
2
2
1
0
7
2.81
Fair
5.21
Apr 30, 2025
@PIT
5.0
6
2
2
0
3
6
1.94
Suboptimal
3.11
Apr 23, 2025
LAD
W
6.0
10
6
3
2
1
4
3.98
Good
2.45
Apr 16, 2025
@SD
L
5.1
6
2
2
0
2
3
2.83
Fair
2.61
Apr 11, 2025
@LAD
L
6.0
4
3
3
1
3
7
1.98
Fair
3.02
Apr 5, 2025
SD
W
6.0
5
0
0
0
1
5
5.18
Good
6.12
Mar 30, 2025
@AZ
5.0
4
0
0
0
3
5
7.29
Excellent
4.86
Sep 21, 2024
@STL
L
4.0
4
2
2
1
3
6
3.49
Fair
3.21
Sep 16, 2024
MIN
2.2
5
3
2
0
3
5
2.40
Fair
2.53
Sep 11, 2024
@CWS
4.1
6
4
1
0
2
9
2.24
Fair
5.03
Sep 6, 2024
@LAD
W
6.0
3
1
1
1
0
6
4.30
Good
6.12
Aug 31, 2024
PIT
L
6.0
4
1
1
0
0
8
3.34
Fair
5.96
Aug 25, 2024
TEX
W
6.0
3
1
1
0
1
4
1.21
Suboptimal
5.21
Aug 20, 2024
@NYY
5.1
4
3
3
2
4
2
4.87
Good
1.23
Aug 13, 2024
CHC
5.1
3
1
1
0
0
6
3.20
Fair
5.38
Jun 26, 2023
@TEX
0.2
1
1
1
1
0
2
5.81
Excellent
3.57
Jun 21, 2023
KC
W
6.0
6
2
2
0
0
7
4.54
Good
5.06
Jun 15, 2023
@MIN
W
6.0
7
4
4
1
1
8
5.31
Good
3.16
Jun 10, 2023
AZ
L
5.0
6
5
5
2
2
3
2.06
Fair
0.09
Jun 4, 2023
@CWS
5.0
3
1
1
0
0
9
2.20
Fair
6.22
May 29, 2023
TEX
L
6.0
5
5
5
1
4
5
4.27
Good
0.40
May 24, 2023
@KC
4.2
3
1
1
0
2
6
7.28
Excellent
4.64
May 19, 2023
@WSH
W
5.2
4
3
3
1
1
4
4.85
Good
3.24
May 12, 2023
SEA
L
1.1
5
6
5
0
4
1
3.34
Fair
-1.44
May 5, 2023
@STL
W
6.0
4
3
1
1
0
6
2.68
Fair
5.96
Apr 29, 2023
BAL
L
5.2
8
6
6
1
1
3
2.64
Fair
-0.58
Apr 24, 2023
@MIL
W
5.0
5
2
2
2
1
8
4.34
Good
5.01
Apr 18, 2023
CLE
5.0
5
3
3
1
2
4
1.98
Fair
2.13
Apr 9, 2023
BOS
L
4.2
5
2
2
0
4
4
4.39
Good
2.34
Apr 3, 2023
@HOU
4.1
2
2
2
0
3
3
1.08
Suboptimal
2.71
Oct 3, 2022
DET
3.0
0
0
0
0
1
5
1.02
Suboptimal
5.66
Oct 1, 2022
OAK
1.0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2.27
Fair
4.08
Sep 27, 2022
TEX
0.1
0
2
2
0
1
0
4.44
Good
1.96
Sep 25, 2022
@KC
0.2
1
0
0
0
0
0
4.69
Good
3.86
Sep 22, 2022
@OAK
W
2.0
1
0
0
0
0
1
4.33
Good
5.01
Sep 19, 2022
@LAA
1.1
2
0
0
0
0
2
2.87
Fair
4.44
Sep 16, 2022
@LAA
1.0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1.26
Suboptimal
3.93
Sep 9, 2022
ATL
2.0
0
0
0
0
1
3
5.29
Good
4.86
Sep 4, 2022
@CLE
W
1.0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1.37
Suboptimal
3.79
Sep 1, 2022
@DET
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.43
Good
4.08
Sep 4, 2021
@CIN
L
4.0
7
5
5
1
2
6
1.20
Suboptimal
0.58
Aug 29, 2021
TOR
L
4.0
4
2
2
2
2
5
3.34
Fair
3.21
Jun 14, 2021
@KC
2.1
5
0
0
0
0
2
2.94
Fair
4.19
Jun 8, 2021
SEA
W
6.0
6
1
0
0
1
3
2.01
Fair
5.36
Jun 1, 2021
@MIL
4.2
5
5
5
3
3
4
2.59
Fair
0.16
May 27, 2021
CLE
L
5.0
6
4
4
1
2
5
1.34
Suboptimal
1.44
May 22, 2021
@KC
L
5.0
8
5
5
0
3
5
3.52
Fair
0.09
May 16, 2021
CHC
L
6.0
6
5
4
1
1
8
3.89
Good
2.74
May 11, 2021
KC
6.0
4
0
0
0
2
5
2.00
Fair
5.36
Apr 29, 2021
@CWS
L
1.0
3
2
2
0
1
2
4.09
Good
2.22
Apr 24, 2021
KC
L
8.0
3
2
1
0
0
3
2.43
Fair
5.01
Apr 18, 2021
@OAK
7.1
4
2
2
1
1
5
4.30
Good
4.14
Apr 13, 2021
@HOU
W
6.2
6
1
1
0
1
4
4.00
Good
4.89
Apr 7, 2021
MIN
L
7.0
7
3
3
0
0
8
2.62
Fair
3.93
Apr 1, 2021
CLE
W
5.2
3
0
0
0
4
2
2.65
Fair
4.55
With a TriSync Rating greater than or equal to 3.75 and less than 5.55, Matthew enters a Good window, where consistent performance is strongly supported. His Aligned profile solidifies this reliably slight edge, as his results historically track his cycles with greater consistency than Variable profiles.
PI=3.910 PIVS=3.040